General

Timothy Doorley, Respondent, v. Mary O'Gorman, Impleaded, Appellant

158 N.Y. 704·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Timothy Doorley, Respondent, v. Mary O’Gorman, Impleaded, Appellant. (Argued February 27, 1899; decided March 7, 1899.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from orders of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 27,1898, affirming orders of Speeial'Term, denying appellant’s application for a new trial made under section 1525 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and also from an order of the Appellate Division, entered September 6, 1898, denying appellant’s motion for leave to appeal from the order of affirmance to the Court of appeals. Doorley v. O'Gorman, 31 App. Div. 216, appeal dismissed. William T. Matthies for motion. No one opposed. [MAJORITY] Motion granted, with costs.