Administrative
John Swenarton et al., Appellants, v. Mary Hancock et al., Respondents
84 N.Y. 653·New York Court of Appeals·1881·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Swenarton et al., Appellants, v. Mary Hancock et al., Respondents.
(Submitted February 8, 1881;
decided March 1, 1881.)
Reposted below (22 Hun, 38). Decided upon the facts in the case.
Man & Parsons for appellant Swenarton.
Jeremiah S. Black & Thomas W. Bartley for appellant Hutton.
William H. Taggard for respondent Locke.
Rufus L. Scott & Edwin G. Davis for respondent Walsh.
James W. Field and Kissam & Embury for respondents Thacher et al.
Amos G. Hull for respondents Allen et al.
Chilion B. Allen for other respondents.
[MAJORITY — Danforth, J.,]
Danforth, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Rapadlo, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.