General
Mary W. Wieder, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company, Appellant
103 N.Y. 646·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary W. Wieder, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued October 5, 1886;
decided October 12, 1886.)
This was a motion to dismiss appeal.
The following is the mem. of opinion :
“Motion to dismiss appeal from the judgment and order is put upon the sole ground that this court has not jurisdiction.
The contrary is well settled. (Julia/ncl v. Bathbone, 39 JST. Y. . 369; Beecher v. Gonradt, 11 How. Pr. 181.)
“ The motion should he denied.”
David Levy for motion.
Howard Townsend opposed.
[MAJORITY — Danforth, J.,]
Danforth, J.,
reads mem. for denial of motion.
All concur.'
Motion denied.