Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
State of TEXAS, plaintiff, v. State of NEW MEXICO and State of Colorado., 2015 — 136 S. Ct. 289 · caselaw · US
General
State of TEXAS, plaintiff, v. State of NEW MEXICO and State of Colorado.
136 S. Ct. 289193 L. Ed. 2d 17·Supreme Court of the United States·2015
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
State of TEXAS, plaintiff,
v.
State of NEW MEXICO and State of Colorado.
No. 141, Original.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 5, 2015.
Motion of El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 for leave to intervene referred to the Special Master. First Interim Motion of the Special Master for allowance of fees and disbursements granted, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $195,461.53 for the period November 3, 2014 through April 30, 2015, to be paid as follows: 37.5% by Texas, 37.5% by New Mexico, 20% by the United States, and 5% by Colorado.