Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McBride, Assignor, v. Teeple, Assignor, 1940 — 311 U.S. 649 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
McBride, Assignor, v. Teeple, Assignor
311 U.S. 649·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Mr. Justice. Roberts took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 76.
McBride, Assignor, v. Teeple, Assignor.
October 14, 1940.
Messrs. J. H. Bruninga and /. H. Sutherland for petitioner. Mr. Frederick Schafer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals denied for want of jurisdiction. Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co., 272 U. S. 693; Pacific Northwest Canning Co. v. Skookum Packers’ Assn., 283 U. S. 858; Fessenden v. Wilson, 284 U. S. 640; Chase v. Avery, 307 U. S. 638.
Mr. Justice. Roberts took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.