Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Barnard v. United States; Lassiter v. United States; and Knippel v. United States, 1965 — 382 U.S. 948 · caselaw · US
General
Barnard v. United States; Lassiter v. United States; and Knippel v. United States
382 U.S. 948·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 310,
No. 345,
No. 346,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Barnard v. United States; Lassiter v. United States; and Knippel v. United States.
Peter A. Schwabe, Jr., for petitioners.
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 342 F. 2d 309.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.