Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LaVallee, Warden, et al. v. Durocher et al., 1964 — 377 U.S. 998 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
LaVallee, Warden, et al. v. Durocher et al.
377 U.S. 998·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1109.
LaVallee, Warden, et al. v. Durocher et al.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald J. Offenkrantz and Barry Mahoney, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners.
Leon B. Polsky for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
[DISSENT — Mr. Justice Harlan,]
Mr. Justice Harlan,
dissenting.
I believe that the issue in this case has an importance which justifies departure from my usual practice of not noting a dissent to a denial of certiorari with which I do not agree. The issue is whether this Court’s holding in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335, is required to be given retroactive effect. That question-, which is of continuing concern in the administration of criminal justice in a substantial number of States, deserves plenary consideration by this Court, which it has not yet had. See my dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U. S. 2, 3.
I would grant certiorari and set the case for argument.