General
ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENNESSEE ex rel. CANALE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL
389 U.S. 57819 L. Ed. 2d 777·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
The Chief Justice would affirm.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENNESSEE ex rel. CANALE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL.
No. 679.
Decided January 15, 1968.
Longstreet Heiskell for appellant.
George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Harlan]
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.
The Chief Justice would affirm.
Mr. Justice Harlan
would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455.