Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DOYLE et al. v. O'BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SOMERVILLE, et al., 1970 — 396 U.S. 277 · caselaw · US
General
DOYLE et al. v. O'BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SOMERVILLE, et al.
396 U.S. 277·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DOYLE et al. v. O’BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SOMERVILLE, et al.
No. 1123,
Misc.
Decided January 12, 1970
Edward J. Duggan for appellants.
Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, John Wall, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence P. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.