General
Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. et al.; and City of Pittsburgh v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. et al.
368 U.S. 974·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 591.
No. 605.
Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. et al.; and City of Pittsburgh v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. et al.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Morton Hollander, Ralph S. Spritzer, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Luke R. Lamb and Peter H. Schiff for petitioner in No. 591. Charles S. Rhyne and Herzel H. E. Plaine for petitioner in No. 605. Harry S. Littman, William C. Braden, Jr., Jack Werner, Harold L. Talisman, Brooks E. Smith and Herbert W. Bryan for respondents. David Stahl, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Herbert E. Squires for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, respectively, as amici curiae, in support of petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Reported below: 293 F. 2d 761.