Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Carl O. AHRENDT v. Robert W. BONYNGE, Agent of the United States before the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and Germany, 1934 — 72 F.2d 1008 · caselaw · US
General
Carl O. AHRENDT v. Robert W. BONYNGE, Agent of the United States before the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and Germany
72 F.2d 1008·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Carl O. AHRENDT v. Robert W. BONYNGE, Agent of the United States before the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and Germany.
No. 6545.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 8, 1934.
Otto C. Sommerich, of New York City, and H. W. McLeod, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
E. B. Freed, U. S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.
Opinion below not for publication.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed pursuant to stipulation of counsel.