Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HANAUER et al. v. ELKINS, PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, et al., 1959 — 358 U.S. 643 · caselaw · US
General
HANAUER et al. v. ELKINS, PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, et al.
358 U.S. 643·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HANAUER et al. v. ELKINS, PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, et al.
No. 580.
Decided February 24, 1959.
O. E. Stone and Robert B. Myers for appellants.
C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and Clayton A. Dietrich, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Hamilton v. Regents of the University of California et al., 293 U. S. 245.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.