Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Mrs. Emma A. Cassady, Administratrix, &c., 1916 — 242 U.S. 611 · caselaw · US
General
The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Mrs. Emma A. Cassady, Administratrix, &c.
242 U.S. 611·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 484.
The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Mrs. Emma A. Cassady, Administratrix, &c.
In error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 10, 1916.
Decided October 23, 1916’.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam'.]
Per Curiam'.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673-674; Great Northern Railway Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464. Mr. Joseph M. Bryson, Mr. Alexander Britton, and Mr. Evans Browne for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. H. L. Stuart for the defendant in error.