Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Benjamin Weisberg, 1903 — 191 U.S. 558 · caselaw · US
General
The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Benjamin Weisberg
191 U.S. 558·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 226.
The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Benjamin Weisberg.
Motion to dismiss submitted October 26, 1903.
Decided November 2, 1903.
Mr. David S. Baker for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Donald G. Perkins for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Circuit' Court of the United States for the District of Rhode Island.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324; The Bayonne, 159 U. S. 687, 692; Chappell v. United States, 160 U. S. 499, 507.