Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George J. Gould et al., as Executors and Trustees of the Estate of Jay Gould, Deceased, Respondents, v. John H. Springer, Appellant, 1908 — 191 N.Y. 514 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
George J. Gould et al., as Executors and Trustees of the Estate of Jay Gould, Deceased, Respondents, v. John H. Springer, Appellant
191 N.Y. 514·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George J. Gould et al., as Executors and Trustees of the Estate of Jay Gould, Deceased, Respondents, v. John H. Springer, Appellant.
Gould v. Springer, 119 App. Div. 868, affirmed.
(Submitted January 29, 1908;
decided February 18, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 23, 1907,' affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon an alleged contract.
A. J. Dittenhoefer and John T. Daston for appellant.
David H. Taylor for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase. JJ.