Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. Henry Silkens, Respondent, v. John McGlyn et al., Composing the Board of Excise of the Town of New Utrecht, Appellants, 1892 — 131 N.Y. 602 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. Henry Silkens, Respondent, v. John McGlyn et al., Composing the Board of Excise of the Town of New Utrecht, Appellants
131 N.Y. 602·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. Henry Silkens, Respondent, v. John McGlyn et al., Composing the Board of Excise of the Town of New Utrecht, Appellants.
(Submitted February 1, 1892;
decided March 1, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department made December 19, 1891, which reversed an order of the excise commissioners of the town of Hew Utrecht, revoking a license granted to the relator.
James C. Church for appellants.
John H. Kemble for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.