Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ng Hong Li, Appellant, v. The United States, 1905 — 196 U.S. 636 · caselaw · US
General
Ng Hong Li, Appellant, v. The United States
196 U.S. 636·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 140.
Ng Hong Li, Appellant, v. The United States.
Appeal from the District Court' of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Argued January 20, 1905.
Decided January 23, 1905.
Mr. Max J. Kohler for appellant.
The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Robb for appellée.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed on the authority of Ah How v. United States, 193 U. S. 65, and cases cited.