General
DRESNER et al. v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
378 U.S. 53912 L. Ed. 2d 1018·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DRESNER et al. v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE.
No. 35.
Argued October 23, 1963.
Questions certified to Supreme Court of Florida December 2, 1963.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Howard Dixon and Carl Rachlin argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Alfred I. Hopkins and Tobias Simon.
Edward J. Hill and Roy T. Rhodes argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was Rivers Buford, Jr.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The questions which this Court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida, 375 U. S. 136, having been answered in the affirmative, 164 So. 2d 208, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. 28 U. S. C. § 1257.