Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Masterson et al. v. Pergament et al., 1953 — 346 U.S. 832 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Masterson et al. v. Pergament et al.
346 U.S. 832·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 133.
Masterson et al. v. Pergament et al.
Lemuel B. Schofield, Lewis M. Dabney, Jr. and Murray C. Bernays for Master-son et al., Samuel Marion for Lefker, Robert S. Marx for Otis & Co., and Clair John Killoran for Lefker et al., petitioners. Theodore E. Rein and Bernard T. Hecht for Pergament et al.; George E. Brand and Gordon Johnson for the Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation; Rockwell T. Gust for Frazer et al., and Harold J. Gallagher for the Kaiser-Frazer Corporation, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion for leave to file brief of Kaiser-Frazer Stockholders Protective Committee, as amicus curiae, denied. Certiorari denied.