Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick Marx et al., Appellants, v. Eugene A. Gross et al., Respondents, 1891 — 125 N.Y. 747 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick Marx et al., Appellants, v. Eugene A. Gross et al., Respondents
125 N.Y. 747·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick Marx et al., Appellants, v. Eugene A. Gross et al., Respondents.
(Submitted January 26, 1891;
decided February 24, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, made October 24,1890, which, modified, and affirmed as modified, an order of Special Term granting leave to defendants to serve an amended answer herein.
George A. Black for appellants.
Foster <& Thomson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion,
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.