General
Dan MORIARITY et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES
5 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dan MORIARITY et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 2, 1925.)
No. 6504.
In error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
William J. Quinn, of St. Paul, 'Minn., for plaintiffs in error.
Lafayette French, Jr., U. S. Atty., and Leland W. Scott, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of St. Paul, Minn.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Reversed, without costs to either party in this court, on confession of error by defendant in error.