Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Emmitt SMITH, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, 1925 — 9 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
Emmitt SMITH, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
9 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emmitt SMITH, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
November 19, 1925.)
No. 3542.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois, Northern Division.
I. R. Wasson, of Peoria, Ill., for plaintiff.
Gertrude Warner, of Peoria, Ill., for the United States.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The various assignments of error presented by this writ are all determined by the opinion in McCarren v. United States, 8 F.(2d) 113, decided by this court October 29, 1925, and need not be again considered.
The judgment is modified, by striking therefrom the fine of $1 imposed upon defendant by virtue of his conviction on count No. 3 of the indictment. In all other respects the judgment Is affirmed.