Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dudley R. Terrett, Respondent, and John Rooney, Appellant, v. James Crombie et al., Appellants, 1875 — 62 N.Y. 618 · caselaw · US
General
Dudley R. Terrett, Respondent, and John Rooney, Appellant, v. James Crombie et al., Appellants
62 N.Y. 618·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dudley R. Terrett, Respondent, and John Rooney, Appellant, v. James Crombie et al., Appellants.
(Argued February 27, 1875;
decided May 25, 1875.)
This was an appeal from an order of General Term affirming an order of Special Term modifying and refusing to vacate an ese parte order in execution of the judgment of this court herein. The facts were quite complicated, and no question of general interest was presented.
Samuel Hand for the appellants.
James Emott for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Allen, J.,]
Allen, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.