Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent, v. The Board of Railroad Commissioners of the State of New York et al., Appellants, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 526 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent, v. The Board of Railroad Commissioners of the State of New York et al., Appellants
187 N.Y. 526·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent, v. The Board of Railroad Commissioners of the State of New York et al., Appellants.
People ex rel. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. v. Bd. Railroad Comrs., 113 App. Div. 895, appeal dismissed.
(Argued January 14, 1907;
decided January 15, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered June 15, 1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to quash a writ of certiorari.
John A. Barhite and Horace G. Pierce for appellants.
Daniel M. Beach for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.