Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexander B. Terwilliger, Appellant, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 629 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexander B. Terwilliger, Appellant
142 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexander B. Terwilliger, Appellant.
(Argued March 12, 1894;
decided April 10, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made December 14, 1893, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Sessions of Ulster county entered upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of rape.
William Lov/nsbery for appellant.
F. A. Westbrook for respondent.
Reported helow, 74 Hun, 810.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on prevailing opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.