General
Edward R. Poerschke, Respondent, v. Philip Horowitz et al., Appellants
178 N.Y. 601·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward R. Poerschke, Respondent, v. Philip Horowitz et al., Appellants.
Poerschke v. Horowitz, 84 App. Div. 443, affirmed.
(Submitted April 7, 1904;
decided April 26, 1904)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 21,1903, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiS entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Jacob Manheim for .appellants.
William F. Hill for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.