General
George T. Stoneman, as Assignee of Arthur G. Gray, Appellant, v. Arthur Van Vechten et al., Respondents
165 N.Y. 666·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George T. Stoneman, as Assignee of Arthur G. Gray, Appellant, v. Arthur Van Vechten et al., Respondents.
Stoneman v. Tan Veehten, 46 App. Div. 370, affirmed.
(Argued January 23, 1901;
decided February 8, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December IS, 1899, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee and granting a new trial.
Samuel S. Hatt for appellant.
Henry F. Stern and Thomas A. Stoddart for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for the defendants on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.