General
BURKARD et al. v. NEW YORK
388 U.S. 451·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BURKARD et al. v. NEW YORK.
No. 807.
Decided June 12, 1967
Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin and Samuel A. Neuberger for appellants in No. 807. Edward Bennett Williams and Raymond W. Bergan for appellants in No. 808.
Frank S. Hogan for appellee in both cases.
Together with No. 808, Habel et al. v. New York, also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.