Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HUDSON COUNTY NEWS CO., INC., v. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, et al, 1964 — 378 U.S. 583 · caselaw · US
General
HUDSON COUNTY NEWS CO., INC., v. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, et al
378 U.S. 583·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HUDSON COUNTY NEWS CO., INC., v. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, et al.
No. 1037.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Julius Kass for appellant.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, Evan William Jahos, Assistant Attorney General, and John W. Hayden, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
Morris B. Abram for Council for Periodical Distributors Associations, Inc., as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.