Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lorenz Leopold, Respondent, v. Esther Hallheimer, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 696 · caselaw · US
General
Lorenz Leopold, Respondent, v. Esther Hallheimer, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
157 N.Y. 696·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lorenz Leopold, Respondent, v. Esther Hallheimer, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Leopold v. Hallheimer, 1 App. Div. 202, affirmed.
(Argued October 24, 1898;
decided November 22, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 7,1896, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at a Special Term of the late City Court of Brooklyn, and granting a new trial.
M. HaTlhei/mer for appellant.
Fernando SoUnger for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
. Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.