Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rosenblatt v. Baer, 1965 — 382 U.S. 802 · caselaw · US
General
Rosenblatt v. Baer
382 U.S. 802·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 11, 1965.
No. 38.
Rosenblatt v. Baer.
Osmond K. Fraenkel, Edward J. Ennis and Melvin L. Wulf for American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.
Stanley M. Brown for respondent, in opposition to the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. N. H. (Cer-tiorari granted, 380 U. S. 941.) Motion of American Civil Liberties Union for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted.