Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Juliet Brush, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 742 · caselaw · US
General
Juliet Brush, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant
158 N.Y. 742·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur, except Bartlett, J., not voting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Juliet Brush, Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued March 24, 1899;
decided April 18, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 15, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an 'order denying a motion for a new trial.
Brush v. Long Island R. R. Co., 10 App. Div. 535, affirmed.
W. G. Beecher and William J-. Kelly for appellant.
Henry A. Monfort for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Bartlett, J., not voting.