General
Zap v. United States
326 U.S. 777·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the length of the brief does not justify the action taken by the Court.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 489.
Zap v. United States.
December 10, 1945.
Mr. Morris Lavine for petitioner.
Solicitor General McGrath, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl, Walter J. Cummings, Jr. and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is denied for failure to comply with par. 2 of Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court. The brief filed in support of the petition is not “direct and concise” as required by that rule.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the length of the brief does not justify the action taken by the Court.