Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George R. Taylor, Respondent, v. Edward Smith, Appellant, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 656 · caselaw · US
General
George R. Taylor, Respondent, v. Edward Smith, Appellant
155 N.Y. 656·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George R. Taylor, Respondent, v. Edward Smith, Appellant.
Reported below, 24 App. Div. 519.
(Argued February 28, 1808;
decided March 8, 1898.)
Motion to amend the notice of appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 10, 1898, affirming a. judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
Shire dé Jellmek for motion.
Tracy 0. Becker opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, without costs.