Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Miles O'Brien et al., Respondents, v. Lawrence J. Fitzgerald, Impleaded, etc., Appellants, 1894 — 144 N.Y. 643 · caselaw · US
General
Miles O'Brien et al., Respondents, v. Lawrence J. Fitzgerald, Impleaded, etc., Appellants
144 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Miles O’Brien et al., Respondents, v. Lawrence J. Fitzgerald, Impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Submitted November 26, 1894;
decided December 4, 1894.)
Motion for re-argument.
Guggenhelmer, TJntemeyer dk Marshall for motion.
.Kellogg & Van Heusen opposed.
Case reported, 143 N. Y. 377.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to amend remittitur by adding: “ With leave to the plaintiffs to amend their complaint upon payment of costs of the demurrer, and within twenty days after notice of entry of judgment; ” no opinion.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.