General
Rufus Binyon, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States
195 U.S. 623·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 176.
Rufus Binyon, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States.
In error to the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory.
Argued October 14, 1904.
Decided October 17, 1904.
Mr. W. H. Green for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Purdy for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Brown v. United States, 171 U. S. 631; Cross v. United States, 145 U. S. 571.