Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rose LEVITON, Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. C. W. PUGSLEY, 1931 — 49 F.2d 1080 · caselaw · US
General
Rose LEVITON, Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. C. W. PUGSLEY
49 F.2d 1080·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rose LEVITON, Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. C. W. PUGSLEY.
No. 9110.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Jan. 23, 1931.
L. B. Schwartz and S. P. Halpem, both of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.
Charles S. Kidder, William H. Freeman,. Charles N. Orr, and Herman F. Stark, all of St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal docketed and dismissed at costs of appellant, on motion of appellee under-Rule 16.