Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lehigh Valley Transportation Company, Claimant, etc., Petitioner, v. Thomas Monk, Jr., et al., 1910 — 217 U.S. 608 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Lehigh Valley Transportation Company, Claimant, etc., Petitioner, v. Thomas Monk, Jr., et al.
217 U.S. 608·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 940.
Lehigh Valley Transportation Company, Claimant, etc., Petitioner, v. Thomas Monk, Jr., et al.
May 31, 1910.
Mr. Archibald G. Thacher for the petitioner.
Mr. Herbert Green, Mr. Jarnés J. Mack-lin and Mr. de Lagnel Berier for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of. Appeals for . the Second Circuit denied.