Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Paul D. Cole, 1918 — 245 U.S. 641 · caselaw · US
General
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Paul D. Cole
245 U.S. 641·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 153.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Paul D. Cole.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas.
Argued January 24, 1918.
Decided January 28, 1918.
Mr. Alfred A. Scott, Mr. Robert Dunlap and Mr. Gardiner Lathrop for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Alfred M. Jackson and Mr, Charles T. Atkinson for defendant in error, submitted.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.-]
Per Curiam.-
Judgment affirmed with costs and ten per cent, damages upon the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169; Southern Ry. Co. v. Puckett, 244 U. S. 571, 574.