Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eliza Pill, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant, 1896 — 148 N.Y. 747 · caselaw · US
General
Eliza Pill, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant
148 N.Y. 747·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eliza Pill, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant.
Reported below, 6 Misc. Rep. 267.
(Argued January 23, 1896;
decided February 18, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, entered upon an order made December 26,. 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion' for a new trial.
William 8. Maddox for appellant.
Oha/rles J. Patterson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.