Ingomar Goldsmith et al., Composing the Firm of Ingomar Goldsmith and Company, Appellants, v. Joseph Haskell, Respondent

Ingomar Goldsmith et al., Composing the Firm of Ingomar Goldsmith and Company, Appellants, v. Joseph Haskell, Respondent. Goldsmith v. Haskell, laO App. Div, 403, appeal dismissed. (Submitted September 30, 1907; decided October 3, 1907.) Motion for leave to withdraw and motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 1, 1907, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate the service of an order of arrest and of the summons and complaint in the qbove-entitled action. ‘The motions were made upon the grounds that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to review the order appealed from and permission to appeal had not been given. Felix II. Levy for appellants. Morris J. Ilirsoh for respondent. [MAJORITY] Appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.