Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward H. Hance et al., etc., Petitioners, v. The United States, 1912 — 225 U.S. 710 · caselaw · US
General
Edward H. Hance et al., etc., Petitioners, v. The United States
225 U.S. 710·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1135.
Edward H. Hance et al., etc., Petitioners, v. The United States.
May 27, 1912.
Mr.' Joseph C. Fraley, Mr. H. N. Paul, Jr:, and Mr. Charles L. StUrfevant' for the petitioners. The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Harr for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ .of certiorari to the United States Circuit Gourt of Appeals for -the Third Gircuit denied.