Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nina Larre Duryea, Appellant, v. Chester B. Duryea, Respondent, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 527 · caselaw · US
General
Nina Larre Duryea, Appellant, v. Chester B. Duryea, Respondent
179 N.Y. 527·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nina Larre Duryea, Appellant, v. Chester B. Duryea, Respondent.
Duryea v. Duryea, 87 App. Div. 633, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted June 2, 1904;
decided June 17, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department,. entered November 30, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying plaintiff’s motion for an allowance for past services of her attorneys in an action for a separation.
Herbert O. Srn/yth and Millard F. Tompkins for appellant.
Frederick H. Man for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.