Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
O. D. CLARK, Sheriff of Toole County, Montana, Appellant, v. John H. HAMILTON, Receiver of Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., et al., Appellees, 1933 — 65 F.2d 1013 · caselaw · US
General
O. D. CLARK, Sheriff of Toole County, Montana, Appellant, v. John H. HAMILTON, Receiver of Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., et al., Appellees
65 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O. D. CLARK, Sheriff of Toole County, Montana, Appellant, v. John H. HAMILTON, Receiver of Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., et al., Appellees.
No. 7224.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 24, 1933
Hall & McCabe, of Great Palls, Mont., for appellant.
Molumby, Busha & Greenan, of Great Palls, Mont., for appellees.
Before SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed; mandate forthwith.