Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Guidet et al., Appellants, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Respondent, 1890 — 120 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Charles Guidet et al., Appellants, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Respondent
120 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Guidet et al., Appellants, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued April 23, 1890 ;
decided June 3, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made the first Monday of May, 1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee.
Charles A. Heshon for appellant. •
W. IF MacFarlamd for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.