Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Theresa Elias, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester Appellant, 1902 — 169 N.Y. 614 · caselaw · US
General
Theresa Elias, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester Appellant
169 N.Y. 614·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Theresa Elias, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester Appellant.
Elias v. City of Rochester, 49 App. Div. 597, affirmed.
(Argued January 15, 1902;
decided January 31, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 7, 1900, sustaining plaintiff’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, and granting a new trial.
William A. Sutherland for appellant.
Oeorge Haines for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and' judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion. ■
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.