Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL et al. v. ARNEBERGH et al., 1965 — 382 U.S. 202 · caselaw · US
General
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL et al. v. ARNEBERGH et al.
382 U.S. 202·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL et al. v. ARNEBERGH et al.
No. 583.
Decided December 6, 1965.
Leon M. Cooper for appellants.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, Harold W. Kennedy, Roger Amebergh, pro se, and Bourke Jones for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.