General
D. Hartman Taber, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Samuel Jack, Respondent, et al.
128 N.Y. 592·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
D. Hartman Taber, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Samuel Jack, Respondent, et al.
(Argued June 4, 1891;
decided June 16, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made the first Tuesday of January, 1891, which affirmed an order of the Special Term denying a motion to punish the defendant, Samuel Jack, for non-compliance with a judgment.
H. B. Cone for appellant.
M. H. Peck for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.