Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alice Wilcox, Respondent, v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 515 · caselaw · US
General
Alice Wilcox, Respondent, v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
187 N.Y. 515·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alice Wilcox, Respondent, v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Wilcox v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 111 App. Div. 908, affirmed.
(Argued December 10, 1906;
decided January 8, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 10, 1906, affirming a judgment of the Monroe County Court which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the Municipal Court of the city of Rochester in an action to recover for the loss of certain articles alleged to have been stolen from a trunk while in possession of the defendant.
Daniel M. Beach for appellant.
George Raines and H. W. Rippey for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Gray and Hiscock, JJ.