Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., et al. v. LOEW'S INC. et al., 1958 — 356 U.S. 43 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., et al. v. LOEW'S INC. et al.
356 U.S. 432 L. Ed. 2d 583·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., et al. v. LOEW’S INC. et al.
No. 90.
Argued January 29, 1958.
Decided March 17, 1958.
W. B. Carman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Homer I. Mitchell, Warren M. Christopher, Loyd Wright and Dudley K. Wright.
Herman F. Selvin argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Joseph P. Loeb.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.